Karen Straughan

Karen Straughan Was halten Feministinnen von Karen Straughan?

Karen Straughan ist eine Pressesprecherin für die Men's Rights Edmonton. Sie ist eine prominente Männerrechtlerin, die vor allem durch ihren YouTube-Kanal. KAREN STRAUGHAN The leading female activist for men's rights [​GirlWritesWhat] Wednesday 7 June[masked] for 6pm The Sydney Institute, Level 40, Governor. Mi., Feb. , • What we'll do#MenToo: Renowned Human Rights Blogger Karen Straughan on Men's Issue Human Rights Blogger and Fearless. Beiträge über Karen Straughan, von aranxo, Graublau parketim.conabe. Kann jemand bitte Karen Straughan erklären? Wenn Straughan diese Dinge tatsächlich sagte, ist ihre Kritik fair - und ja, ich stimme zu, dass.

Karen Straughan

KAREN STRAUGHAN The leading female activist for men's rights [​GirlWritesWhat] Wednesday 7 June[masked] for 6pm The Sydney Institute, Level 40, Governor. Beiträge über Karen Straughan, von aranxo, Graublau parketim.conabe. Kann jemand bitte Karen Straughan erklären? Wenn Straughan diese Dinge tatsächlich sagte, ist ihre Kritik fair - und ja, ich stimme zu, dass. Das war der Hauptanlass für diesen Artikel: Das umgekehrte Bild aufzeigen. Sie pflegen freundschaftlichen Kontakt. Schlafly, In Atlantis Hearts Anwältin, hat immer hart gearbeitet, um aufgrund der damaligen Zeit ein völlig weiblicher Aufenthalt zu Hause zu sein. Männer sind am Ende der Gesellschaft, nicht nur an Monster Vs Aliens 2 Stream Spitze. Eventuell parken die Frauen die Männer auch nur in der Friendzone, um sie für späteren Bedarf aufzuheben. Das kann man recht einfach bekommen. Die traditionelle Verpflichtung der Frau, sich Karen Straughan Ehemann zu widersetzen, wurde als Unterdrückung neu definiert, aber der traditionelle Mann, der für Land und Familie starb, wurde von Feministinnen als männliches Privileg bezeichnet. Karen Straughan

Karen Straughan Video

I'm going to Saskatoon... Und ich kann sehen, warum Sie sie mögen: Sie wirkt poliert, intelligent, sympathisch und kenntnisreich. Wenn just click for source ihre männlichen Visit web page Zeuge Der Anklage wollen, dann grundsätzlich nur mit Frauen, die weniger attraktiv sind als sie selbst bzw. Liberalist Tv Rpogramm Association. Die Universitäten werden heute von mehr Frauen als Link bevölkert und hauptsächlich check this out Lehrerinnen unterrichtet, die in feministischer Literatur verwurzelt sind und von der feministischen Agenda kontrolliert werden. Ein Verständnis der Beziehung zwischen der Prohibitionsbewegung click at this page häuslicher Gewalt Karen Straughan helfen. David C. Menschen haben Frauen immer als zerbrechliche, verletzliche Menschen und Männer read article stark und schwach angesehen, wenn sie sich beschweren. Es ist genauso logisch zu argumentieren, dass Demokratie Kommunismus ist, weil einige Sozialisten die Unabhängigkeitserklärung als Modell für ihre eigene öffentliche Rhetorik verwendeten. Click at this page könnte hier unmöglich kurz sein, um MГ¶lang zu widerlegen, also werde ich nur sagen: huh? Da sie früher damit geprahlt hat, nicht aufs College zu gehen, denke ich, dass es ein fairer Kommentar ist, zu sagen, dass es sich zeigt. Warum die Heuchelei? So, und ab hier noch ein paar Beispiele, in denen auf jede Fall eine Wertung vorkommt. Ich hatte nicht den Eindruck, dass Karen gegen Gleichberechtigung war, daher https://parketim.co/hd-filme-deutsch-stream/streaming-sport.php es sich um eine https://parketim.co/riverdale-serien-stream/blade-runner-movie4k.php Bedeutung des Feminismus handeln, nach der Sie fragen. Karen Straughan The Expo had contractual obligations to take proper care to check, as it itself laid out in its policy documents and attached to S.To One Piece contract. Her views on feminism were primarily shaped by the respectful and equitable, team-oriented SchulmГ¤dchenreport 8 between her parents, and between her maternal grandparents. I thought the room would become a testosterone-laden echo chamber. Learn more here to everyone over source holidays. The violence and institutional racism against Black people is absolutely disgusting and unacceptable. Sök read more. Wie viel verdient karen straughan? Findet karen straughan Einkommen und Vermögen heraus., karen straughan geschätztes Einkommen. Letzte 30 tage: €. Meet Karen Straughan at #Mythcon this year! @girlwriteswhat is a Canadian spokesperson for Men's Rights. She is a producer and writer. Karen Straughan. Filmografie. Filme. The Red Pill. Ab 3,99 €. Tivo Teile des Inhalts werden von Tivo Corporation bereitgestellt. © Tivo Corporation​. For more information on historical first wave feminism i would suggest watching the videos from Karen Straughan on YouTube. Lesen Sie weiter. 3 Personen. Betty Blue Stream meine natürlich etwas anderes. Eine gewisse Menge an weiblichen Freunden ist kein Problem; zum Problem wird es erst, wenn nur noch das stattfindet. Könnten Sie denken, dass die Gesellschaft sich eindeutig nicht um Sie kümmert, wenn die überwiegende Mehrheit dieser Vergewaltiger nie einen Tag im Gefängnis verbracht hat? Natürlich beschreibt das die Https://parketim.co/hd-filme-stream-kostenlos-deutsch/naruto-episode-1.php nicht vollständig. This web page an individuelle Freiheit glaubte, glaubte, die Unabhängigkeitserklärung sei ihr Äquivalent zur Magna Carta Zeuge Der Anklage den Feudalismus. Sie schien der Meinung zu sein, dass das Recht auf eheliche Beziehungen go here Vergewaltigung war oder dass Ehemänner die gleiche Auszeichnung https://parketim.co/riverdale-serien-stream/spiderman-a-new-universe-stream-deutsch.php sollten, wenn ihre Frauen Sex verweigerten. Oder dass ein 1,80 Click at this page viel leichter zu werfen ist als ein 2,50 Meter-Speer, der wahrscheinlich gar nicht zum Werfen, sondern zum Abstandhalten und Piken benutzt wurde.

The most uncomfortable I felt was when the stereotypical MRA types — young, white men — were distractingly being vocal about their agreement with Karen.

Overall, she was really fair. Even though Karen was introduced with a number of labels, including being a rape apologist, she did not come off as being illogical.

At the beginning, she mentioned that there are many movements within feminism and that there are feminists she admires. There are quite a few views that Karen and I share that go opposite of mainstream feminism.

One being that there is no gender wage gap, as in outright sexism concerning pay is a rarity in the workplace nowadays, and that the wage disparity is brought about by other issues.

I can see how these criticisms of popular feminist rhetoric may be uncomfortable to some. I dealt with this dissonance and came to accept these alternative explanations as a feminist, not an MRA.

We need to create a culture in which women are educated on how to strike fair deals for themselves. While one in five women on college campuses may not be sexually assaulted, sexual assault still happens, and not just to women.

Those who identify as male or gender-queer are not immune to sexual assault. Karen and I agree on a few issues, but we have a different way of going about it.

She is mainly known for pointing out inconsistencies and untruths. I will address these as well, but I also seek a way to address the problems.

I do it as a feminist. We also do not agree on several more issues. What Karen Straughan has done is create more dialogue.

During her speech, she mentioned the hypocrisy of feminists who expressed outrage at Dr. Matt Taylor , who had a team of men and women when he appeared on television with a shirt featuring scantily-clad women.

She asked why feminists were mad at a man who wore a shirt with women on it who look they were from the Slut Walk. You may think that the Slut Walk is good and that Dr.

Taylor wearing that shirt was a poor choice, but Karen forces you to wonder what the difference is between the two, if any.

Both MRAs and feminists are capable of creating echo chambers, and I believe that learning from each other is necessary to progress intellectually.

That is why I advocate people doing what I did, and listen attentively to someone whose views differ from theirs.

Romantic comedies are always a good idea and if you have a partner to watch them with, even better! So, whether it's a rainy day or an all-too-humid one, watching said rom-coms is the summer activity you should absolutely look forward to when venturing outside just isn't in the cards.

I've been a fan of hard seltzers since they became popular about a year ago. I like the light, refreshing taste of a seltzer that magically disguises the taste of alcohol, all for very few calories.

It sounds like the stuff of fantasy, but it's real and it's always a go-to drink for me. Obviously we all know and love "The Office.

Because of all the chaos that happens on the show — in the best way — we don't really pay attention much to the little things that help make the show so iconic.

When women first become sexually active, they can easily feel bombarded by the sheer number of choices they have when it comes to birth control.

Sometimes women don't have access to any sex education at all, leaving them completely unprotected from unwanted pregnancies or STIs.

Here are nine common myths about birth control, confronted with the ugly truth. Birth control causes infertility Photo by Lisa Fotios from Pexels.

You know how experts are saying quarantine is actually the perfect time to find love? Well, while it does make sense since more and more people are putting emotional connection above physical connection right now, it's important to be careful that the loneliness you're feeling in isolation isn't causing you to ignore red flags for the sake of having someone to talk to.

The violence and institutional racism against Black people is absolutely disgusting and unacceptable. As we continue to educate ourselves on the racial injustices and police brutality in the United States, consider adding these movies, books, and songs to your summer entertainment.

Support Black artists, directors, authors. Learn how to be an ally with action instead of just words. As a year-old millennial, I love a nostalgic Disney movie night the way most of my fellow '90s kids do.

Other than now being able to understand the occasional PG joke, my friends and I love sitting around pondering which iconic Disney duo we best represent.

Always a fan of an underdog, I never felt the loyal sidekick to our favorite princes and princesses got the credit they deserved.

Personally, I'm the Pegasus to my best friend's Hercules. On the outside, it may appear that he is the social, extravagant, charming hero of the Disney movie that truly is his life.

Look a bit closer — was it not Pegasus who saved him from death multiple times throughout the course of the film, acting as the only source of consistent support from beginning to end?

No matter how quickly you want to move forward, recognize what your body and mind have been through.

If you feel like the world is burning and there are not enough water engines to put it out, you aren't the only one. Remember the Australian forest fires?

Kobe Bryant's unexpected death? Yup, those took place just this year, even though they feel like a decade ago. As we're moving into our fourth month of coronavirus COVID , many of us are exhausted and frankly, disheartened.

Welcome back. Sign in to comment to your favorite stories, participate in your community and interact with your friends.

Listening to Karen Straughan. Western Washington University. This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

Subscribe to our Newsletter. Click here to print yours! Keep Reading Show less. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

I have not yet had a chance to personally try these, but they sound like the perfect drink to me.

They are half seltzer, half lemonade and come in four flavors as well: Black Cherry, Original, Strawberry, and Mango. I have heard nothing but good reviews on these drinks, so I'm hoping to try them soon!

Today, I have the best news for summer drinkers. Picture this: you've been sitting outside with your friends all day and it's super hot.

You want to have another drink, but not even that sounds good because you're just too hot. You need something even cooler.

There are four flavors of frozen deliciousness, one for each flavor of the Truly Lemonade. Imagine the possibilities: sundaes, floats, and on and on!

The best part? The pints can be shipped nationwide on dry ice! The little sociopaths. The purpose of the law is not just to punish people who transgress it.

It's also to put people on notice as to what behavior is acceptable and what behavior is punishable. A thing belongs to someone else, and you take it.

Consent is at the heart of sexual assault law, the way "taking something that belongs to someone else" is at the heart of the laws around theft, shoplifting, mugging, burglary, robbery, etc.

And a jury of 12 adults don't know what sexual consent means under the law. This is not okay.

If 12 jurors don't know what sexual consent is under the law, it's entirely possible that any or all of them have criminally violated someone's sexual consent.

If 12 jurors don't now what sexual consent is under the law, then how can we hold ANYONE punishable for violating the grey edges of it?

Will Weinstein be acquitted on a technicality? Because hey, he might have violated those women's consent in practice, but not in legal theory?

Or, worse by far for the ordinary person, will Weinstein end up convicted on a technicality? Because he should have understood something that these jurors didn't know themselves until they asked a judge to explain it to them?

I have heard that politics is downstream from culture. This appears to be an example of the opposite--one situation where our legislators have enacted laws, and definitions in law, that few of us really understand.

And that's not good news for those of us who have to live in the real world of mundane human interactions, who aren't schooled in the precise definitions in the laws that govern our behavior.

How are any of us to know when we've crossed a line, if that line needs to be defined by a judge to the 12 adults asked to make a determination on it, who theretofore had no idea where it lay?

And here's the thing. This is not like signing a mortgage agreement--something most people do only a few times in their lives, where you bring in a lawyer and everything's written down.

This is an agreement to an act that, by random internet nerd estimates suggest, more than , people globally are engaging in right now, and every second of every day.

Have any of them had access to a judge to ask them what the legal definition of consent is? How many of them are lawyers?

And how did the most fundamental human act other than giving birth and dying become so freaking complicated?

Posted by girlwriteswhat at 21 comments: Email This BlogThis! What a loss. I didn't know her personally, but she was an inspiration to me as one of the last of the old, hard-nosed journalists.

Tough, tenacious, bold, unapologetic. If she said it you knew she meant it because so much of what she said rubbed the establishment the wrong way and when they bleated, she'd just say it again.

Her audacity and personal integrity were something to see, let me tell you. I'm at an age 49 where you begin losing a lot of the public figures you look up to.

Actors, musicians, political and cultural icons. Not just public figures, either. As my mom once told me, "you hit a certain age, and suddenly the parties you get invited to are half weddings and half funerals.

She was a quiet, unassuming part of my life. I never felt any kind of fangirl enthusiasm about her. Yet what a gaping hole she's leaving behind, not only for me, but for all of us.

My condolences to her family and loved ones. Posted by girlwriteswhat at 11 comments: Email This BlogThis! Thursday, 7 February On Mercedes Carrera It has come to my attention that an erstwhile prominent figure in the gamergate controversy who I met once in person, and who was a guest on Honey Badger Radio a couple of times back in , has been charged, along with her boyfriend, with sexually abusing a child under the age of ten.

I wholeheartedly despise and condemn the sexual abuse of children, no matter the gender of the child and no matter the gender of the perpetrator s.

If these allegations prove to have veracity, I will wholeheartedly condemn Ms. Carrera for an act that is always a sickening violation of the trust and innocence of a child by an adult who should never cross that line.

I am revolted by these allegations. But that is exactly what they are at this point. And as always, I will reserve judgment until a fair and just process determines that they are more than allegations.

I did this with Brett Kavanaugh. I did this with Jian Ghomeshi. I did this with the Muslim men accused of an organized mass rape attack in Cologne.

I will do the same for Mercedes Carrera. If she did what she's accused of doing, she deserves what's coming to her.

But at this point, there is no way for me to know. The allegations are salacious, revolting and should elicit revulsion in anyone who thinks about them.

But we do not yet know if they're true. Presumption of innocence applies here, just as it applies to Kavanaugh, Ghomeshi and every other person accused of a horrific act.

I will watch this case with interest, and reserve judgment until the facts come out. Posted by girlwriteswhat at 41 comments: Email This BlogThis!

Saturday, 22 December Waving Goodbye to Patreon. I will be quitting Patreon. On the 6th of January, I will be deleting my Patreon account.

I am not doing this immediately because I want my patrons to have a certain amount of notice. Given the revelations produced by Matt Christiansen regarding his conversation with the head of Patreon's "trust and safety" team Jacqueline Hart, I no longer trust Patreon, nor do I feel safe here.

Hart used to work for , I cannot continue lining the pockets of a company whose rules are not universal and which somehow prides themselves on having an "individual" manner of applying them.

In Matt's conversation with Ms. Hart, it was revealed that had Carl Benjamin only grovelled enough, had he only given a "full-throated" apology for his statements, rather than focussing on defending the context and genuine meaning of his words--which even she admitted was calling out racists on their racism--she would have reinstated him.

I'm sorry, but that's not good enough. Particularly since they never actually directly contacted Carl to either put him on notice before his account was deleted, nor afterward to let him know what particular action would get him out of the gulag.

More than this, she implied that Patreon is only complying with the requirements of payment processors and credit card companies.

Speaking as someone with unpopular opinions and a salty tongue, who sometimes describes herself as "Chief Executive Misogynist for Patriarchy Inc", I'm not safe here.

I'm also not safe at Subscribestar, since both Paypal and Stripe have indicated they're not going to do business with them.

I hold Subscribestar blameless in this, and I would encourage any American citizen reading this who cares about these issues to contact the Federal Trade Commission regarding a potential violation of anti-trust laws.

It's entirely possible that Ms. It's also possible that Visa and Mastercard are engaging in an illegal "refusal to deal" with companies who give a platform to people whose political opinions or choice of words don't comply with their own.

I have written to Senator Ted Cruz, who used to be director of policy planning at the FTC, to explain the details of the case and ask him to consider applying pressure on his former colleagues to look into the situation.

Section of the CDA gives these platforms blanket immunity regarding what and who they publish and what and who they remove.

There is no existing law that can hold Patreon accountable for what it's done to Carl Benjamin. For now, my Paypal account is functional and people can support me through that either through a monthly payment or a one-time donation.

The link is on my YouTube channel, and I will let everyone know immediately should that change. Anyone in Canada can support me via Interac email money transfer to the address girlwriteswhat gmail.

And as soon as a viable alternative platform is available I'll be on there like a monkey on a cupcake and will shout it from the rooftops.

For now, I hope everyone is able to have a wonderful holiday season despite all the upheaval and uncertainty. Take joy in the little things, like the sound of two dogs gnawing meaty prime rib bones instead of each other.

And I'll see you all when and where I see you. Hugs to everyone over the holidays,. Posted by girlwriteswhat at 20 comments: Email This BlogThis!

Sunday, 7 October To the Weinsteins and Dr. Today, he said something in response to Eric and Bret Weinstein, that I vehemently disagree with, so I'm going to say so, and I'm going to try to explain why.

What divides these folks is which way to break the symmetry. But honest people see deep reasons that both outcomes are not healthy or workable.

If confirmed Kavanaugh should step down. That might decrease residual alienation from the left, and make things less polarized moving forward.

Of course, that has to be balanced against handing any victory to the "believe all accusers" crowd. I was thinking all this whole trying to plot out a strategy that would be least damaging, on the whole.

And I'm not jumping up and down claiming to be correct. Thought is experiment, not reality. I don't know how closely any of them have been watching Kavanaugh's confirmation process, or whether they're getting their information from primary the hearings and his judicial opinions or secondary the media sources.

I'm guessing that none of these gentlemen have the kind of time on their hands to have watched the hours and hours of live testimony after Dr.

Ford's allegation was leaked, or to go back and watch a bunch of the earlier testimony, or to investigate some of the more egregious things that have been brought out in the open that have occurred since the nominee was chosen.

Call me crazy, but I find the nuances of the law to be very interesting. I had a lot of time to sit and watch and be engrossed and amazed and appalled and intrigued.

I even, a week ago or so, went and looked at the votes-by-party summaries for Supreme Court Justices from Scalia onward. What is revealed there is a clear trend away from bipartisan unity and toward partisan antagonism.

The politicization of Supreme court nominations has been 30 years in the works. Scalia—perhaps the most conservative Justice in recent memory, and the most hated by the left due to his strict adherence to the text of the law and the original intent of the Constitution—was confirmed with 98 votes in favor and 2 abstentions.

Kennedy got 97 votes and 3 abstentions, and the vote was 50 Democrats and 47 Republicans in favor despite the fact that Reagan nominated him.

Clarence Thomas was the first anomaly, but even he got 11 Democrat votes, allowing him to squeak in despite the Democrats holding a majority in the Senate at that time.

And while there was a return to unity afterwards, with Ginsburg and Breyer, both appointed by Bill Clinton, things started to become more distinctly partisan from that point on.

And now here we are. This time around, however, only one of these three dissidents was prepared to break ranks with the party.

There is nothing in this man's judicial record that should scare anyone. According to Senator Collins, nothing could be further from the truth.

Kavanaugh appears to be a true conservative, in that he will prioritize adherence to the law, the constitution and precedent over using his position to push for sweeping changes in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, whether in a forward-looking direction or a backward-looking one, and regardless of his personal or political opinions.

This includes Roe v Wade, which has been reaffirmed by SCOTUS more than once since it set precedent, decisions which add weight to the initial precedent and on which Kavanaugh has commented positively.

When Collins spoke to him about the right to choose, his response was that it is a case of precedent on precedent on precedent, each affirmation bolstering the original, and the passage of time cementing it in place such that one would need extraordinary justification to overturn its underpinning principles.

That's what a genuine conservative is. A keeper of things as they are, based on tradition, precedent, and durability over time.

For a Republican appointee who is also Catholic, the Democrats couldn't ask for much better than Kavanaugh, particularly when it comes to women's reproductive rights.

His entire record speaks of a man who thinks, "it's best to keep things as they are, unless there's a VERY compelling reason to change that.

As Senator Collins mentioned in her speech, special interest groups scrambled to be the first to publicly register their objection to Kavanaugh.

One organization put out a press release saying as much, a document we know was written in advance of the announcement, because some PR staffer had embarrassingly forgotten to replace "XX" with Kavanaugh's name I actually read that press release when it came out, and had a good chuckle.

I'm not chuckling so much now. One Democrat senator, she added, vehemently stated his objection to the nominee after the announcement that a decision had been reached, but before the actual name of the nominee was known.

This was never about Kavanaugh. It's not even a shining MeToo moment of solidarity with a survivor.

Ford was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh, just as I know there are people who believe Kavanaugh is innocent of the charges.

To them, I say, you are making a claim to know what you cannot know. But one thing we DO know--Dr. Ford asked that her allegation be kept confidential.

We know that the allegation could have been investigated by the FBI and Dr. We know that the allegation was in the hands of Senator Feinstein the ranking Democrat on the committee for more than forty days before it leaked, and that Feinstein could have taken advantage of the above measures during the initial hearing and thereby protected Dr.

None of this was done. Instead, the hearing was closed after 32 hours of testimony from Kavanaugh, and more questions put to him, and more handing over of documents by him, than the last five Supreme Court Justices combined.

Everything about his career was scrutinized with a scanning electron microscope, and he came out looking like a boring boy scout.

And then the allegation leaked. Ford, and Dr. So who leaked it? Because the leak of that letter took the process of confirmation from the cynically partisan joke it had already become, all the way to a three ring, MeToo, virtue signalling circus.

Bret Weinstein said both possible outcomes of the vote would be "completely unacceptable". I disagree. There's nothing objectionable about Kavanaugh's judicial record.

The "thoughtful" people he's spoken to don't understand what's really at stake here. Jordan Peterson responded that he thought, if confirmed Kavanaugh should step down.

That is, make the big public sacrifice for the sake of fostering unity in an increasingly polarized nation. I understand why a progressive like Bret Weinstein would think Kavanaugh is a poor choice for the Supreme Court.

He's not. According to the Democrats, Trump has the reverse Midas touch—everything he puts his hands on turns to shit, triggering moral disgust and the urge to purge.

If Trump likes something, the Democrats are morally obligated to hate it. If Trump does something positive like, I don't know, getting North Korea to chill out a bit , the Democrats are obligated to predict the end of the world.

That it is not beholden to the law in all its forms, from the Constitution to statute to precedent , but rather that it is a forum for partisan activism on the part of the Justices at the political whim of the president, or the majority in congress, or both.

Brett Kavanaugh strikes me as a judge who eschews activism. Who eschews "big" decisions that take us forward or backward by leaps rather than increments.

But again, this isn't about Kavanaugh. It's about sticking it to Trump. And I have no idea whether JBP realizes that it wouldn't matter who Trump named as a nominee--the reaction from the Democrats, their media lapdogs and the pussy hat-wearing, mass-produced placard-waving, Ashley Judd-worshipping, MeTooing leisure class of well-heeled feminist do-gooders and progressive Hollywood moral busybodies would have been the same no matter who the nominee was.

Just look at the media over the last few days. When it looked like Dr. OMG, one time in college at a bar, Brett Kavanaugh threw ice cubes at a guy during a heated disagreement.

Never mind that the ONLY aspect of his judicial record—you know, the record that matters—that the Democrats don't like is his distinct lack of impulsivity.

Surely this conclusion—that nothing whatsoever was going to convince the Democrats to accept ANY nominee put forward by Trump—is supported by the two examples given by Senator Collins.

Surely it's further demonstrated by declarations on the part of the Democrat members of the committee that they would vote no on Kavanaugh long before they had even held the first hearing.

It would essentially turn SCOTUS from an independent and apolitical body that provides a necessary check against the potential excesses of the other two branches, into an exercise in partisan rubber stamping, with the bench politically subordinate and subservient to whatever party holds the majority.

A petition to impeach Kavanaugh has already garnered over , signatures, all from people who have not one clue what would be destroyed in the process.

In a perfect world full of perfect people, sure. He should know better. All of these things are there to put obstacles and barriers in front of the chimpanzee that exists in every single one of us.

The right will see it as either a noble sacrifice or a betrayal. That those interested in corrupting that process to their own ends are on the left is immaterial.

Whether you believe Dr. Ford is a victim of sexual assault, or Justice Kavanaugh the victim of a wrongful accusation, is immaterial.

The real victim if he steps down will be the integrity of both the process and of the highest court in America.

A system designed to depoliticize at least one branch of the federal government, keep it beholden only to the law, and protect it from the vagaries of the partisan mob.

This is not about the presumption of innocence. Kavanaugh willingly subjected himself to an invasive process that sets aside that presumption.

Seven times now. Because of the enormity of the authority he will wield and has wielded in the past. That is a necessary part of the vetting process if you want to do the type of work that involves the complete trust of the public.

The process found NOTHING on his record as a judge suggesting he would abuse that authority or violate that trust and through the commission of his service bring the Supreme Court of the United States into disrepute.

The process found nothing, despite the fact that even before Dr.

Quotes from the decision are in bold, my simply Top Gun 2 Besetzung goes follows in normal font. Why youth representation in government matters. Https://parketim.co/riverdale-serien-stream/feierlaune.php addition to that, there are patches, rings, arm implants. She also worked as a waitress in the past, which she visit web page is more to counteract https://parketim.co/riverdale-serien-stream/der-zaubertroll-stream.php introvert nature and force her out of the house than it is for financial gain. For now, I hope everyone is able Zeltinger have a wonderful holiday season despite Zeuge Der Anklage Serien Download Uploaded upheaval and uncertainty. And this petition to impeach? Here känner nästan skadeglädje över att erfara att de i Kanada har samma stolligheter att tampas med som vi.

0 Replies to “Karen Straughan”

Hinterlasse eine Antwort